this transformation is somehow familiar (as it will stay „in the family“) ;-)
(i have to fill the lines here to not blast the weblog layout-cause of the graphic following – lalalalalalal)
Northern Australia telephony uninteratted. she Climbed the backwaters of rh rockies and stumbled upon metonymy …. *waiting the bull sheeved
*Jeff Koons owes it to Warhol
*Heinz owes it to Mahler
*Broccade is a tense stuttering
fish folwing
Of course the Internet is fish*Internet ist fisch not because og their interelation with flukes* neither serendipity* mais thet lambency* kerzenlicht schooling flocking or movement a shimmer of a twist like baked beans
but, dear reader, writer, salesman, water and stood heady cloud udder shudder upon moorland heath, farmlands esoteric nonsense teknologising better than the Internet, I ask you this….
is the colour of sand the colour of a soldier crab?
but, the answer would always be a penguin. Immanuel Kant couldn’t do it, Levi Strauss couldn’t do it
not even Jung and his protozoic fiction anima/animas and streams of consciousness
it’s a seeigel, c’est non?
a very distinct „seeigel“. sitting on the neck of a show window… :-)
non c’est une fleur i can see it in the breath of the oily window.
[go] Jeff Koons „high culture“
() go () philip simmons
I can see a distinct „seeigel“ entering the bedroom. A „seeigel“ unfolding its legs to become a „seestern“
{} don’t GO__ !! [] http://www.artnet.com/ag/ fineartthumbnails.asp?aid=9741
perfect kitsch!
(GOHST KITSCH) >> like jeff koons is beautfy(ing) duchamp
this transformation is somehow familiar (as it will stay „in the family“) ;-)
(i have to fill the lines here to not blast the weblog layout-cause of the graphic following – lalalalalalal)
http://www.the-solar-system.net/ planet-neptune.html
plankton?
non, c’est kitsch „seestern“ !! :)
ah! „kunst begriff“ (conceptual art)!! :O
dolphins
la lune c’est non?
southamerica.html
c’est un delphin?
watch northwards rise
the papillion du Mexiko
Nevada-bull-raylene02.jpg
space [ +]
[ – ]
[ * ]
(( and then atoms
–))
+ –
0
intuition formula by introspection ..
u = space !
= atomos
+ –
0
metaphor is not knowing –
[ not knowing what?
linguistical error []
nothing = 0
something = 0
the soft voices of leaves
knowing as a sentence
a daisy chain of
quiet, quiets varying
sounds
soldier_crab
Northern Australia telephony uninteratted. she Climbed the backwaters of rh rockies and stumbled upon metonymy …. *waiting the bull sheeved
*Jeff Koons owes it to Warhol
*Heinz owes it to Mahler
*Broccade is a tense stuttering
fish folwing
Of course the Internet is fish*Internet ist fisch not because og their interelation with flukes* neither serendipity* mais thet lambency* kerzenlicht schooling flocking or movement a shimmer of a twist like baked beans
neither chance (mais oui) nor the everywhere of water (og) will describe telecommunications as if pop art had a new canvas
but, dear reader, writer, salesman, water and stood heady cloud udder shudder upon moorland heath, farmlands esoteric nonsense teknologising better than the Internet, I ask you this….
is the colour of sand the colour of a soldier crab?
but, the answer would always be a penguin. Immanuel Kant couldn’t do it, Levi Strauss couldn’t do it
not even Jung and his protozoic fiction anima/animas and streams of consciousness
fish skooling like windows reflekshuns op. art already there